A1, A2. Joy wrongly convinced Joseph committed the crime/Why she was wrong/ Warrant issued based on report of bruising to Cua's face, ribs, hands, and his not acting his ususal outgoing, gregarious self. (Should one act like nothing happened when faced with a tragedy?)

B. Det. Taylor testimony: no bruising to Cua's face, hands, torso

C. Exculpatory evidence given by expert witnesses

D. Unidentified bloody fingerprint found on Suzanne's belt. R. Fourcraft (coroner)reported abrasions/markings on upper torso and neck region similar to belt found next to Suzanne.

E. Cua's shoes didn't match crime scene bloody footprints

F. Unknown 3rd party DNA on Suzanne's left breast and under four fingernails

G. Unknown 3rd party DNA in diluted blood spot on toilet seat cover

H. Unknown 3rd party DNA in blood stains on Fernand’s shoulder; and front and back of Fernand’s pants

I. Unknown 3rd party DNA in blood stain on staircase

J. Photo of cut on side of ring finger could not have occurred while wielding a knife.

K. Pathologist: blunt force injuries caused by something like a bat/candlestick (not a fist)

L. EBAY close of auction on 6/14/06 - the reason for my not taking my scheduled flight and drive down Hi 101 to Oxnard was to clean and deliver pink slip, as well as installing woodwork I’d refinished

M. Joy Cua stated that I brought six chairs in truck from Burlingame

N. Prosecutor posited that the crime was committed soon after I spoke with Edith Edmonds on the Wagners’ land line around 9:30 a.m. on 6/13/06. She stated that all seemed fine with the Wagners and me.

OPQ. Det. Aronis testimony that all calls listed on the Wagners’ caller ID were “missed calls”, and identified each call discussed with prosecutor as calls not picked up by the Wagners. NOTE: Norbert Wagner and 11:36 calls confirmed as missed calls.

R. Police report: Sgt. Gibbons reports that Det. Aronis stated that “The last call came in at 11:36 a.m. - all calls after that were missed calls.” This proves that the prosecutor and Det. Aronis knew that Aronis committed perjury.

S. Stipulations entered that Norbert Wagner and Lorraine Peterson spoke with the Wagners at length up to around noon.

T. Donald Kent saw and waved at Fernand as Fernand drove home around noon.

U. Phillipe Chagniot testified that Cua called and left a voicemail that said he was in charge and would sell the buildings. Phillipe’s number is not on Cua’s call list.

V. Det. Taylor and Cua discussed his being a trustee. Yet, Taylor stated in the police report that I said that all they owned would be mine when they died - which mirrors a statement Joy made to Taylor in their interview (represents motive and a reason to hold me).

W. Prosecutor falsely states in summation: (1) Cua left the bloody footprints at the crime scene; (2) Lorraine Peterson’s phone call went unanswered; (3) and by Sunday, its (hand bruising) still there and it’s photographed.

X1, 2. Prosecutor speculates in closing argument that Cua canceled flight, drove down 101 instead of I-5 in order to get rid of evidence along the way. Joy knowingly testified at the preliminary hearing that it was unusual for Cua to drive directly to the boat. As shown in EXHIBIT L, Cua’s boat sold at auction the next morning. Joy also mentioned the boat sale in the police reports. Joy and prosecutor knew the reason for Cua to drive to Oxnard was the boat sale and to bring down the six chairs mentioned in EXHIBIT M.